• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. "If I Become a Vegetable, Then no": A Thematic Analysis of How Patients and Physicians Refer to Prognosis When Discussing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
 
  • Détails
Titre

"If I Become a Vegetable, Then no": A Thematic Analysis of How Patients and Physicians Refer to Prognosis When Discussing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Gerontology & geriatric medicine
Auteur(s)
Sterie, A.C.
Auteure/Auteur
Castillo, C.
Auteure/Auteur
Jox, R.J.
Auteure/Auteur
Büla, C.J.
Auteure/Auteur
Rubli Truchard, E.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Büla, Christophe  
Jox, Ralf Jürgen  
Castillo, Clara  
Rubli, Eve  
Sterie, Anca-Cristina  
Liens vers les unités
Soins palliatifs et de support  
Humanités en médecine  
Gériatrie&Réadaptation gériatrique  
ISSN
2333-7214
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2023
Volume
9
Première page
23337214231208824
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Background: Documenting decisions about the relevance cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a standard practice at hospital admission yet a complex task. Objective: Our aim was to explore how physicians approach and discuss CPR prognosis with older patients recently admitted to a post-acute care unit. Method: We recorded 43 conversations between physicians and patients about the relevancy of CPR that took place at admission at the geriatric rehabilitation service of a Swiss university hospital. Thematic analysis determined (i) who initiated the talk about CPR prognosis, (ii) at what point in the conversation, and (iii) how prognosis was referred to. Results: Prognosis was mentioned in 65% of the conversations. We categorized the content of references to CPR prognosis in five themes: factors determining the prognosis (general health, age, duration of maneuvers); life (association of CPR with life, survival); proximal adverse outcomes (broken ribs, intensive care); long-term adverse outcomes (loss of autonomy, suffering a stroke, pain, generic, uncertainty); and being a burden. Discussion and conclusion: Discussing CPR is important to all patients, including those for whom it is not recommended. Information about CPR prognosis is essential to empower and support patients in expressing their expectations from life-prolonging interventions and attain shared decision-making.
Sujets

Cpr

cardiopulmonary resus...

geriatric patients

patient-physician com...

prognostics

shared decision-makin...

CPR

PID Serval
serval:BIB_39879CE3B571
DOI
10.1177/23337214231208824
PMID
37954661
WOS
001097487100001
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/40351
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2023-11-16T13:48:25.447Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T14:00:12Z
Fichier(s)
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom

Sterie AC et al. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2023.pdf

Version du manuscrit

published

Licence

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Taille

182 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

PID Serval

serval:BIB_39879CE3B571.P001

URN

urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_39879CE3B5717

Somme de contrôle

(MD5):a235580025e9a666e56929017e51c651

  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales