• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  
Auteur(s)
Froehlich, F.
Auteure/Auteur
Thorens, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Schwizer, W.
Auteure/Auteur
Preisig, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Köhler, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Hays, R.D.
Auteure/Auteur
Fried, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Gonvers, J.J.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Gonvers, Jean-Jacques  
Preisig, Martin  
Liens vers les unités
Gastro-entérologie  
PMU/UNISANTE  
Psychiatrie générale  
Instituts et centre de rech. du DP  
ISSN
0016-5107
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
1997
Volume
45
Numéro
1
Première page
1
Dernière page/numéro d’article
9
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't - Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is generally performed with the patient sedated and receiving analgesics. However, the benefit of the most often used combination of intravenous midazolam and pethidine on patient tolerance and pain and its cardiorespiratory risk have not been fully defined. METHODS: In this double-blind prospective study, 150 outpatients undergoing routine colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either (1) low-dose midazolam (35 micrograms/kg) and pethidine (700 micrograms/kg in 48 patients, 500 micrograms/kg in 102 patients), (2) midazolam and placebo pethidine, or (3) pethidine and placebo midazolam. RESULTS: Tolerance (visual analog scale, 0 to 100 points: 0 = excellent; 100 = unbearable) did not improve significantly more in group 1 compared with group 2 (7 points; 95% confidence interval [-2-17]) and group 3 (2 points; 95% confidence interval [-7-12]). Similarly, pain was not significantly improved in group 1 as compared with the other groups. Male gender (p < 0.001) and shorter duration of the procedure (p = 0.004), but not amnesia, were associated with better patient tolerance and less pain. Patient satisfaction was similar in all groups. Oxygen desaturation and hypotension occurred in 33% and 11%, respectively, with a similar frequency in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the combination of low-dose midazolam and pethidine does not improve patient tolerance and lessen pain during colonoscopy as compared with either drug given alone. When applying low-dose midazolam, oxygen desaturation and hypotension do not occur more often after combined use of both drugs. For the individual patient, sedation and analgesia should be based on the endoscopist's clinical judgement.
Sujets

Adult

Aged

Analgesia

Analgesics, Opioid

Analysis of Variance

Anesthetics, Combined...

Anesthetics, Intraven...

Blood Pressure Determ...

Colonoscopy

Confidence Intervals

Conscious Sedation

Double-Blind Method

Female

Heart Rate

Humans

Male

Meperidine

Midazolam

Middle Aged

Oxygen Consumption

Pain

Pain Measurement

Patient Satisfaction

Prospective Studies

PID Serval
serval:BIB_871
DOI
10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70295-5
PMID
9013162
WOS
A1997WF73400001
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/165731
Date de création
2007-11-19T11:47:11.995Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T23:44:05Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales