• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
PLoS ONE  
Auteur(s)
van der Zwaag, W.
Auteure/Auteur
Gruetter, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Martuzzi, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Gruetter, Rolf  
Liens vers les unités
Radiodiagnostic & radiol. Interven.  
ISSN
1932-6203
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Volume
10
Numéro
8
Première page
e0134610
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Studying body representations in the brain helps us to understand how we humans relate to our own bodies. The in vivo mapping of the somatosensory cortex, where these representations are found, is greatly facilitated by the high spatial resolution and high sensitivity to brain activation available at ultra-high field. In this study, the use of different stimulus types for somatotopic mapping of the digits at ultra-high field, specifically manual stroking and mechanical stimulation, was compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity of the brain responses. Larger positive responses in digit regions of interest were found for manual stroking than for mechanical stimulation, both in terms of average and maximum t-value and in terms of number of voxels with significant responses to the tactile stimulation. Responses to manual stroking were higher throughout the entire post-central sulcus, but the difference was especially large on its posterior wall, i.e. in Brodmann area 2. During mechanical stimulation, cross-digit responses were more negative than during manual stroking, possibly caused by a faster habituation to the stimulus. These differences indicate that manual stroking is a highly suitable stimulus for fast somatotopic mapping procedures, especially if Brodmann area 2 is of interest.
Sujets

Adult

Brain Mapping

Female

Humans

Magnetic Resonance Im...

Male

Mechanical Processes

Physical Stimulation

Somatosensory Cortex/...

Time Factors

Touch Perception

Young Adult

PID Serval
serval:BIB_229C30AC76E5
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0134610
PMID
26285027
WOS
000359666100013
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/51644
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2015-09-15T15:36:14.652Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T14:51:48Z
Fichier(s)
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom

26285027_BIB_229C30AC76E5.pdf

Version du manuscrit

published

Taille

6.67 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

PID Serval

serval:BIB_229C30AC76E5.P001

URN

urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_229C30AC76E56

Somme de contrôle

(MD5):777ecb65008efcb9ad9f749e67119e17

  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales