• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Characterizing the top trading cycles rule for housing markets with lexicographic preferences when externalities are limited
 
  • Détails
Titre

Characterizing the top trading cycles rule for housing markets with lexicographic preferences when externalities are limited

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Social Choice and Welfare  
Auteur(s)
Bettina, Klaus
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Klaus, Bettina  
Liens vers les unités
Département d'économie  
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2024-11-08
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
We consider a housing market model with limited externalities where agents care both about their own consumption via demand preferences and about the agent who receives their endowment via supply preferences [we extend the associated lexicographic preference domains introduced in Klaus and Meo (Econ Theory 76:779– 811, 2023)]. If preferences are demand lexicographic, then our model extends the classical Shapley–Scarf housing market (Shapley and Scarf, J Math Econ 1:23–37, 1974) with strict preferences model. Our main result s a characterization of the corresponding top trading cycles (TTC) rule by individual rationality, pair efficiency, and strategy-proofness (Theorem 1), which extends that of Ekici (Theo Econ 19:551–564, 2024) from classical Shapley–Scarf housing markets with strict preferences to our model. Two further characterizations are immediately obtained by strengthening pair efficiency to either Pareto efficiency or pairwise stability (Corollaries 1 and 2). Finally, we show that as soon as we extend the preference domain to include demand lexicographic as well as supply lexicographic preferences (e.g., when preferences are separable), no rule satisfying individual rationality, pair efficiency, and strategy-proofness exists (Theorem 2).
PID Serval
serval:BIB_8BE2867237C0
DOI
10.1007/s00355-024-01556-9
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/207551
URL éditeur
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01556-9
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2025-05-07T12:27:23.385Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T03:14:12Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales