• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Deciding whether to consult the GP or an emergency department: A qualitative study of patient reasoning in Switzerland.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Deciding whether to consult the GP or an emergency department: A qualitative study of patient reasoning in Switzerland.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
European Journal of General Practice  
Auteur(s)
Henninger, S.
Auteure/Auteur
Spencer, B.
Auteure/Auteur
Pasche, O.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Spencer, Brenda  
Pasche, Olivier  
Liens vers les unités
PMU/UNISANTE  
ISSN
1751-1402
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2019-07
Volume
25
Numéro
3
Première page
136
Dernière page/numéro d’article
142
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Background: Non-urgent care is an important factor responsible for rising healthcare costs and general practitioners (GPs) are known to be more cost-effective than emergency departments (EDs). Objectives: To understand the reasons why patients confronted with a medical problem perceived as urgent choose to consult either a GP or an ED. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in Switzerland, using data collected between 2014 and 2015 through semi-structured interviews of adults with non-vital medical problems. Half were recruited after an ambulatory consultation in an ED, and half were patients who consulted their GP. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed according to the constant comparative method. Results: The main reason given by patients who consulted their GP first was the quality of the relationship. The more meaningful the relationship, the more likely patients were to seek advice from their GP. One marker of a privileged relationship was GPs supplying their mobile phone number to the patient. The perceived nature of the complaint, for example, symptoms considered as life-threatening or severe pain, together with the expected waiting time in an ED were additional factors influencing the patients' choice. Conclusion: Our study showed that when patients are confronted with what they perceive as a medical emergency, the quality of the relationship with the GP, in particular the continuity of care provided, seem to be the major reasons why they consult their GP rather than an ED.
Sujets

Adult

Aged

Aged, 80 and over

Decision Making

Emergencies/epidemiol...

Emergencies/psycholog...

Emergency Service, Ho...

Female

General Practice/stat...

General Practitioners...

Humans

Interviews as Topic

Male

Middle Aged

Physician-Patient Rel...

Switzerland

Time Factors

Young Adult

Family practice

emergencies

mobile phone number

physician–patient rel...

qualitative research

PID Serval
serval:BIB_2D6B7D5B6DAC
DOI
10.1080/13814788.2019.1634688
PMID
31272245
WOS
000474177500001
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/103491
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2019-07-12T13:57:44.344Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T18:50:41Z
Fichier(s)
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom

BIB_2D6B7D5B6DAC.pdf

Version du manuscrit

published

Taille

992.98 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

PID Serval

serval:BIB_2D6B7D5B6DAC.P001

URN

urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_2D6B7D5B6DAC4

Somme de contrôle

(MD5):5ececcf25e35b196f46a9d1c72d115e3

  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales