• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Scope and Limits of “Inclusivism” in Modern South Asia: Questioning Tagore's and Agyeya's “Universalism”
 
  • Détails
Titre

Scope and Limits of “Inclusivism” in Modern South Asia: Questioning Tagore's and Agyeya's “Universalism”

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Politeja  
Auteur(s)
Pozza, Nicola
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Pozza, Nicola  
Liens vers les unités
Lang./civil. slaves et Asie du Sud  
ISSN
1733-6716
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Volume
13
Numéro
40
Première page
197
Dernière page/numéro d’article
214
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
During the twentieth century, it had become increasingly common among scholars working on modern India to oppose Indian leaders and authors advocating the idea of multicultural and secular India to those promoting a nation based solely on the so -called "Hindu way of life." While the discourse attributed to the former category has regularly been qualified as "universalist," "inclusivist" or "tolerant," the kind of nationalism fostered by the latter has variously been called "communalist" or "exclusivist." While these antagonistic positions might certainly fit with the positions of iconic and emblematic figures such as M.K. Gandhi or V.D. Sawarkar respectively, they might well be misleading and too restrictive when applied to the discourses of authors such as Rabindranath Tagore (1861 -1941) and S.H. Vatsyayan 'Agyeya' (1911 -1987), to take into consideration only two among the most influential and celebrated authors and poets of modern India. Based on the analysis of Tagore's and Agyeya's texts, this contribution questions the accuracy of such a dichotomist categorization and more specifically the assertion that the works of twentieth -century authors considered as "universalists" were actually presenting a picture of a united India with both Hindus and Muslims looking forward to a peaceful future together (Cush and Robinson, see footnote 3). It shows that, notwithstanding the real cosmopolitan worldview of both these authors, the Muslim realm is almost completely absent from their works. In conclusion, it is argued that far from being an exception, the position of these writers is illustrative of what can be called a "non -exclusive Hindu nationalism," which was pervasive among the Indian intellectuals of the twentieth -century India.
Sujets

Tagore

Agyeya

Modern India

Literature

Inclusivism

Universalism

Nationalism

Hindu

Religion

PID Serval
serval:BIB_89D454E443DA
DOI
10.12797/politeja.13.2016.40.13
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/226291
URL éditeur
http://www.politeja.wsmip.uj.edu.pl/en_GB/o-pismie
Date de création
2016-06-01T12:24:12.751Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T04:46:18Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales