• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Tobacco Control  
Auteur(s)
Buckell, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Marti, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Sindelar, J.L.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Marti, Joachim  
Liens vers les unités
Médecine sociale et préventive (IUMSP)  
ISSN
1468-3318
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2018-05-28
Volume
28
Numéro
2
Première page
168–175
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Résumé
To provide the policy-relevant estimates of impacts of alternative flavour bans on preferences and demand for cigarettes and e-cigarettes in adult smokers and recent quitters.
A best-best discrete choice experiment (DCE) is used to elicit smokers' and recent quitters' preferences for flavours, price, health impact and nicotine level in cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Choice of tobacco products and an opt-out option were examined. An efficient design yielded 36 choice sets. Exploded logit choice models were estimated. Flavour bans are modelled by restricting flavour coefficients in the estimated model.
A sample of 2031 adult smokers and recent quitters was recruited to complete an online survey and DCE.
Current smokers and recent quitters, on average, prefer cigarettes and menthol cigarettes over flavoured e-cigarettes. However, there is substantial preference heterogeneity by younger adults (ages 18-25), race/ethnicity and respondents with higher education. Our predictions suggest that a ban on menthol cigarettes would produce the greatest reduction in the choice of cigarettes (-5.2%), but with an accompanying increase in e-cigarettes use (3.8%). In contrast, banning flavours in e-cigarettes, while allowing menthol in cigarettes would result in the greatest increase in the selection of cigarettes (8.3%), and a decline in the use of e-cigarettes (-11.1%). A ban on all flavours, but tobacco in both products would increase 'opting-out' the most (5.2%) but would also increase choice of cigarettes (2.7%) and decrease choice of e-cigarettes (-7.9%).
A ban on flavoured e-cigarettes alone would likely increase the choice of cigarettes in smokers, arguably the more harmful way of obtaining nicotine, whereas a ban on menthol cigarettes alone would likely be more effective in reducing the choice of cigarettes. A ban on all flavours in both products would likely reduce the smoking/vaping rates, but the use of cigarettes would be higher than in the status quo. Policy-makers should use these results to guide the choice of flavour bans in light of their stance on the potential health impacts both products.
Sujets

economics

electronic nicotine d...

public policy

PID Serval
serval:BIB_FF1BC132742E
DOI
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054165
PMID
29807947
WOS
000471873800012
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/231391
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2018-05-31T16:07:40.695Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T05:11:40Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales