• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. The Relevance of Typology for Pattern Replication
 
  • Détails
Titre

The Relevance of Typology for Pattern Replication

Type
article
Institution
Externe
Périodique
Journal of Language Contact  
Auteur(s)
Meyer, Robin
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Meyer, Robin  
ISSN
1877-1491
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2019-01-28
Langue
anglais
Résumé
<jats:p>Structuralists and generativists have insisted for a long time that the elements and structures one language could borrow from another are constrained by typological compatibility, naturalness, and other factors (cf. Thomason and Kaufman 1988: 13–34). Such constraints are still thought to apply to structural interference, or pattern replication in the terms of Matras and Sakel (2007), and the often concomitant contact-induced grammaticalisation of non-native structures.</jats:p><jats:p>This paper suggests that <jats:italic>a priori</jats:italic> there are no typological constraints against pattern replication in general. It is proposed that typological differences between model and replica pattern are only of relevance during the grammaticalisation and maintenance of such patterns in the replica language; in other words, typological constraints do not apply at the stage of pattern replication. It will be argued that typology, in the form of system pressure, interacts with pattern frequency and socio-historical factors, which together determine retention, adaptation, or loss of a replicated pattern.</jats:p><jats:p>This argument is illustrated on the basis of three short studies of partial alignment change in Old Aramaic, Classical Armenian, and North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic, all of which have been in contact with Iranian languages for extended periods. In each case, Iranian ergative alignment patterns have been replicated, adapted, grammaticalised to varying degrees, and finally ousted in favour of nominative-accusative alignment. The loss of the replica pattern in each case is shown to be dependent on both typology, extent of bilingualism, and pattern frequency.</jats:p>
PID Serval
serval:BIB_B47C1337315E
DOI
10.1163/19552629-01203002
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/203531
URL éditeur
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01203002
Date de création
2020-10-01T15:40:18.460Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T02:54:23Z
Fichier(s)
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom

JLC_012_03_002_Meyer.pdf

Version du manuscrit

published

Licence

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Taille

455.83 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

PID Serval

serval:BIB_B47C1337315E.P001

Somme de contrôle

(MD5):e0016657e1ec0f21a29591e8cbb69913

  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales