• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Does the public's negative perception towards wood in rivers relate to recent impact of flooding experiencing?
 
  • Détails
Titre

Does the public's negative perception towards wood in rivers relate to recent impact of flooding experiencing?

Type
article
Institution
Externe
Périodique
Science of the Total Environment  
Auteur(s)
Ruiz-Villanueva, Virginia
Auteure/Auteur
Díez-Herrero, Andrés
Auteure/Auteur
García, Juan Antonio
Auteure/Auteur
Ollero, Alfredo
Auteure/Auteur
Piégay, Hervé
Auteure/Auteur
Stoffel, Markus
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Ruiz-Villanueva, Virginia  
ISSN
0048-9697
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2018-09
Volume
635
Première page
294
Dernière page/numéro d’article
307
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Instream large wood (LW) is widely perceived as a source of hazard that should be avoided. This is also the case of Spain, where wood has been systematically removed from rivers for decades. Consequently, people are accustomed to rivers with minimal or no LW at all. However, the presence and transport of wood is natural and has positive ecological effects. Previous studies reported that the general negative perception towards LW in rivers is related to the lack of background knowledge about stream ecology or fluvial dynamics. However, we hypothesize here that recent flooding experience has an influence on the perception of LW as well. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed groups of individuals living in different areas of Spain that have been affected more or less frequently by floods. In addition, we surveyed a group of scientists to test whether their perception towards LW differs from that of the general public. We observe that flooding experience is not the main controlling factor of how LW is perceived. Instead, we observe that respondents, independently of the time passed since the last flood, perceived watercourses with LW as less aesthetically, more dangerous, and with a larger need to improve channels than in watercourses without LW. Regional differences were detected, potentially related to differences in environmental attitudes. We confirm the existence of a gap in perception between scientific communities and the general public regarding natural river systems with wood; thereby highlighting the need to transfer knowledge, training, and education to bridge this gap. The generalized negative perception towards LW could have important consequences on the implementation of river management measures, such as LW augmentation for restoration purposes. This study underlines that wood removal should be more balanced in post-flood works and that public information is needed to implement a balanced LW management policy.
Sujets

Public perception, Ri...

PID Serval
serval:BIB_624FC1AD3B8E
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.096
PMID
29674258
WOS
000436494400029
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/130384
URL éditeur
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85045396756&partnerID=MN8TOARS
Date de création
2020-10-17T10:03:45.585Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T20:52:09Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales