• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Right ventricular systolic function assessment: rank of echocardiographic methods vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Right ventricular systolic function assessment: rank of echocardiographic methods vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Type
article
Institution
Externe
Périodique
European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology
Auteur(s)
Pavlicek, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Wahl, A.
Auteure/Auteur
Rutz, T.
Auteure/Auteur
de Marchi, S.F.
Auteure/Auteur
Hille, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Wustmann, K.
Auteure/Auteur
Steck, H.
Auteure/Auteur
Eigenmann, C.
Auteure/Auteur
Schwerzmann, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Seiler, C.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Rutz, Tobias  
ISSN
1532-2114
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011-11
Volume
12
Numéro
11
Première page
871
Dernière page/numéro d’article
880
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Evaluation Studies ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Right ventricular (RV) systolic function is prognostically important, but its assessment by echocardiography remains challenging, in part because of the multitude of available measurement methods. The purpose of this prospective study was to rank these methods against the reference of RV ejection fraction (EF) as obtained in a broad clinical population by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Two hundred and twenty-three individuals were included in the study. The following seven Doppler echocardiographic parameters were tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for their accuracy to distinguish between normal and moderately impaired RVEF by MRI (RVEF cut-off 50%), respectively, between moderately and severely reduced RVEF (cut-off 30%): RV fractional area and fractional long-axis change (FLC), RV myocardial performance index (MPI), tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion, Doppler tissue imaging-derived isovolumic acceleration and peak systolic velocity (S') at the lateral tricuspid annulus, and strain at the lateral free wall as obtained by speckle-tracking echocardiography. Survival analysis was performed. All seven Doppler echocardiographic parameters correlated significantly with RVEF by MRI (range between 5 and 85%). RVEF <50% was best detected by S' < 11 cm/s: area under the ROC curve 0.779 (95% confidence interval 0.716-0.843), sensitivity 0.740, and specificity 0.753. RVEF ≤30% was best detected by MPI > 0.50: area under the ROC curve 0.948 (95% confidence interval 0.906-0.991), sensitivity 0.947, and specificity 0.852. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed reduced cumulative survival among patients with RVEF ≤30% (P = 0.0003).
A systolic long-axis peak velocity of <11 cm/s at the lateral tricuspid annulus most accurately detects moderately impaired RVEF as obtained by MRI; severely reduced RVEF ≤30% is best detected by RV MPI at a value of >0.50.
Sujets

Adult

Echocardiography, Dop...

Female

Humans

Magnetic Resonance Im...

Male

Middle Aged

Predictive Value of T...

Prospective Studies

ROC Curve

Reference Values

Sensitivity and Speci...

Survival Analysis

Switzerland

Ventricular Dysfuncti...

Ventricular Dysfuncti...

Ventricular Dysfuncti...

Ventricular Function,...

PID Serval
serval:BIB_42FDB9002DE2
DOI
10.1093/ejechocard/jer138
PMID
21900300
WOS
000298849500012
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/67154
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2017-08-07T10:13:03.089Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T16:02:40Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales