• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Wandel der Therapie der akuten Endophthalmitis: Analyse von 92 Fallen der Jahre 1980-1993. [Change in therapy of acute endophthalmitis: an analysis of 92 cases 1980-1993]
 
  • Détails
Titre

Wandel der Therapie der akuten Endophthalmitis: Analyse von 92 Fallen der Jahre 1980-1993. [Change in therapy of acute endophthalmitis: an analysis of 92 cases 1980-1993]

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde  
Auteur(s)
Wolfensberger, T. J.
Auteure/Auteur
Korner, F.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Wolfensberger, Thomas Jona  
Liens vers les unités
Hôpital ophtalmique Jules Gonin  
ISSN
0023-2165
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
1995-05
Volume
206
Numéro
5
Première page
420
Dernière page/numéro d’article
2
Notes
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article --- Old month value: May
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to develop possible criteria for the choice of vitrectomy in the treatment of endophthalmitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with endophthalmitis who were seen between 1980 and 1993 were reviewed retrospectively and analysed regarding pathogenesis, bacteriological aetiology, as well as pre- and postoperative visual acuity comparing intravenous (i.v.) therapy alone to a combination with vitrectomy in 3 pretherapeutic visual acuity classes (class I < 0.02, class II 0.02- < 0.1 and class III > or = 0.1). RESULTS: Endophthalmitis most commonly occurred after cataract extraction (39%). The best prognosis regarding final visual acuity was found with Staph. epidermidis infection, the worst with Streptococci. Postoperative visual acuity in class I was significantly better after vitrectomy with 0.18 +/- 0.06 (Standard Error = SE) compared to i.v. therapy alone (0.06 +/- 0.03 SE) (p < 0.05 unpaired Student t-Test). In class II, no such difference could be demonstrated. In class III, i.v. therapy yielded significantly better results (0.8 +/- 0.09 SE) than vitrectomy (0.53 +/- 0.14 SE), however only by comparing the final - but not the best - obtained posttherapeutic visual acuity. CONCLUSION: The more favourable results after vitrectomy in patients with very poor pretherapeutic vision suggest an important role of vitrectomy in the presence of extensive vitreous opacifications. The better outcome after i.v. therapy in patients with pretherapeutic vision > or = 0.1 could be influenced by the very short follow-up period which renders an evaluation of a potential loss of vision due to late complications after endophthalmitis impossible.
Sujets

Acute Disease *Catara...

PID Serval
serval:BIB_9D283FF3569E
DOI
10.1055/s-2008-1035480
PMID
7609404
WOS
A1995RB53700040
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/152632
Date de création
2008-01-28T12:05:41.187Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T22:40:09Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales