Titre
Editor's Choice - Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definition, Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting Standards.
Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Auteur(s)
Sörelius, K.
Auteure/Auteur
Wyss, T.R.
Auteure/Auteur
Adam, D.
Auteure/Auteur
Beck, A.W.
Auteure/Auteur
Berard, X.
Auteure/Auteur
Budtz-Lilly, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Chakfé, N.
Auteure/Auteur
Clough, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Czerny, M.
Auteure/Auteur
D'Oria, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Dang, M.
Auteure/Auteur
di Summa, P.G.
Auteure/Auteur
Eldrup, N.
Auteure/Auteur
Fourneau, I.
Auteure/Auteur
Heinola, I.
Auteure/Auteur
Hosaka, A.
Auteure/Auteur
Hsu, R.B.
Auteure/Auteur
Huang, Y.K.
Auteure/Auteur
Jutidamrongphan, W.
Auteure/Auteur
Kan, C.D.
Auteure/Auteur
Kölbel, T.
Auteure/Auteur
Lau, C.
Auteure/Auteur
Lawaetz, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Mani, K.
Auteure/Auteur
Moulakakis, K.
Auteure/Auteur
Oderich, G.S.
Auteure/Auteur
Resch, T.
Auteure/Auteur
Schmidli, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Sedivy, P.
Auteure/Auteur
Shirasu, T.
Auteure/Auteur
Suwannanon, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Szeberin, Z.
Auteure/Auteur
Touma, J.
Auteure/Auteur
van den Berg, J.C.
Auteure/Auteur
Veger, H.
Auteure/Auteur
Wanhainen, A.
Auteure/Auteur
Weiss, S.
Auteure/Auteur
Contributrices/contributeurs
Adam, D.
Beck, A.W.
Berard, X.
Budtz-Lilly, J.
Chakfé, N.
Clough, R.
Czerny, M.
D'Oria, M.
Dang, M.
di Summa, P.G.
Eldrup, N.
Fourneau, I.
Heinola, I.
Hosaka, A.
Hsu, R.B.
Huang, Y.K.
Jutidamrongphan, W.
Kan, C.D.
Kölbel, T.
Lau, C.
Lawaetz, M.
Mani, K.
Moulakakis, K.
Oderich, G.S.
Resch, T.
Schmidli, J.
Sedivy, P.
Shirasu, T.
Suwannanon, R.
Szeberin, Z.
Touma, J.
van den Berg, J.C.
Veger, H.
Wanhainen, A.
Weiss, S.
Groupes de travail
Academic Research Consortium of Infective Native Aortic Aneurysm (ARC of INAA)
Liens vers les personnes
Liens vers les unités
ISSN
1532-2165
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2023-03
Volume
65
Numéro
3
Première page
323
Dernière page/numéro d’article
329
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
There is no consensus regarding the terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, or reporting standards for the disease of infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA), previously known as mycotic aneurysm. The aim of this study was to establish this by performing a consensus study.
The Delphi methodology was used. Thirty-seven international experts were invited via mail to participate. Four two week Delphi rounds were performed, using an online questionnaire, initially with 22 statements and nine reporting items. The panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements revised, and results presented in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach's alpha coefficient > .80.
All 38 panellists completed all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation and agreement that this study was necessary, and the term INAA was agreed to be optimal. Three more statements were added based on the results and comments of the panel, resulting in a final 25 statements and nine reporting items. All 25 statements reached an agreement of ≥ 87%, and all nine reporting items reached an agreement of 100%. The Cronbach's alpha increased for each consecutive round (round 1 = .84, round 2 = .87, round 3 = .90, and round 4 = .92). Thus, consensus was reached for all statements and reporting items.
This Delphi study established the first consensus document on INAA regarding terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, as well as reporting standards. The results of this study create essential conditions for scientific research on this disease. The presented consensus will need future amendments in accordance with newly acquired knowledge.
The Delphi methodology was used. Thirty-seven international experts were invited via mail to participate. Four two week Delphi rounds were performed, using an online questionnaire, initially with 22 statements and nine reporting items. The panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements revised, and results presented in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel selecting "strongly agree" or "agree" on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach's alpha coefficient > .80.
All 38 panellists completed all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation and agreement that this study was necessary, and the term INAA was agreed to be optimal. Three more statements were added based on the results and comments of the panel, resulting in a final 25 statements and nine reporting items. All 25 statements reached an agreement of ≥ 87%, and all nine reporting items reached an agreement of 100%. The Cronbach's alpha increased for each consecutive round (round 1 = .84, round 2 = .87, round 3 = .90, and round 4 = .92). Thus, consensus was reached for all statements and reporting items.
This Delphi study established the first consensus document on INAA regarding terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, as well as reporting standards. The results of this study create essential conditions for scientific research on this disease. The presented consensus will need future amendments in accordance with newly acquired knowledge.
PID Serval
serval:BIB_E51E2A2D9D81
PMID
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2022-12-12T10:07:58.590Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T03:06:38Z
Fichier(s)![Vignette d'image]()
En cours de chargement...
Nom
36470311.pdf
Version du manuscrit
published
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Taille
263.34 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
PID Serval
serval:BIB_E51E2A2D9D81.P001
URN
urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_E51E2A2D9D819
Somme de contrôle
(MD5):2523efdcba6bf2bd3f214ce7aed0038a