• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.
 
  • Détails
Titre

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.

Type
synthèse (review)
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Modern Pathology  
Auteur(s)
Tan, P.H.
Auteure/Auteur
Cheng, L.
Auteure/Auteur
Srigley, J.R.
Auteure/Auteur
Griffiths, D.
Auteure/Auteur
Humphrey, P.A.
Auteure/Auteur
van der Kwast, T.H.
Auteure/Auteur
Montironi, R.
Auteure/Auteur
Wheeler, T.M.
Auteure/Auteur
Delahunt, B.
Auteure/Auteur
Egevad, L.
Auteure/Auteur
Epstein, J.I.
Auteure/Auteur
Contributrices/contributeurs
Adeniran, A.
Al-Ahmadie, H.
Algaba, F.
Allan, R.
Amin, M.
Barry, M.
Bastacky, S.
Baydar, D.
Bégin, L.
Berney, D.
Billis, A.
Boccon-Gibod, L.
Bostwick, D.
Brito, M.
Burks, T.
Busch, C.
Camparo, P.
Cheng, L.
Cohen, C.
Datta, M.
de Leval, L.
Delahunt, B.
Delprado, W.
Egevad, L.
Epstein, J.
Evans, A.
Falzarano, S.
Fine, S.
Fridman, E.
Furusato, B.
Ganji, M.
Glantz, L.
Gopalan, A.
Grignon, D.
Grobholz, R.
Guo, C.
Gupta, R.
Gurel, B.
Hailemariam, S.
Hakam, A.
Hameed, O.
Hansel, D.
Henke, R.P.
Herawi, M.
Hirsch, M.
Huang, J.
Huang, W.
van de Kaa, C.H.
Humphrey, P.
Iczkowski, K.
Jones, E.
Jones, M.
Jufe, L.
Kench, J.
Kim, H.J.
Kragel, P.
Kristiansen, G.
Leite, K.R.
Lewin, C.D.
Lloreta, J.
Lopez-Beltran, A.
Lucia, S.
Luthringer, D.
Magi-Galluzzi, C.
McCue, P.
McHale, T.
McKenney, J.
Merino, M.
Montironi, R.
Nesi, G.
Netto, G.
Oliva, E.
Oliveira, P.
Osunkoya, A.
Paner, G.
Parwani, A.
Picken, M.
Pizov, G.
Renshaw, A.
Ro, J.
Rohan, S.
Ronchetti, R.
Rubin, M.
Samaratunga, H.
Sankila, A.
Schned, A.
Sesterhenn, I.
Shabaik, A.
Shah, R.
Shanks, J.
Shen, S.
Shim, J.
Shiraishi, T.
Speights, V.O.
Srigley, J.
Sung, M.T.
Suzigan, S.
Takahashi, H.
Tan, P.H.
Tetu, B.
Tickoo, S.
Tomaszewski, J.
Troncoso, P.
Trpkov, K.
True, L.
Tsuzuki, T.
Turner, J.
van der Kwast, T.
Weiss, M.
Wheeler, T.
Wojno, K.
Volmar, K.
Wu, C.L.
Yao, J.
Yilmaz, A.
Zhai, J.
Groupes de travail
ISUP Prostate Cancer Group
Liens vers les personnes
de Leval, Laurence  
Liens vers les unités
Institut universitaire de pathologie (IUPA)  
ISSN
1530-0285
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011-01
Volume
24
Numéro
1
Première page
48
Dernière page/numéro d’article
57
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Consensus Development Conference ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston, made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to surgical margin assessment were coordinated by working group 5. Pathologists agreed that tumor extending close to the 'capsular' margin, yet not to it, should be reported as a negative margin, and that locations of positive margins should be indicated as either posterior, posterolateral, lateral, anterior at the prostatic apex, mid-prostate or base. Other items of consensus included specifying the extent of any positive margin as millimeters of involvement; tumor in skeletal muscle at the apical perpendicular margin section, in the absence of accompanying benign glands, to be considered organ confined; and that proximal and distal margins be uniformly referred to as bladder neck and prostatic apex, respectively. Grading of tumor at positive margins was to be left to the discretion of the reporting pathologists. There was no consensus as to how the surgical margin should be regarded when tumor is present at the inked edge of the tissue, in the absence of transected benign glands at the apical margin. Pathologists also did not achieve agreement on the reporting approach to benign prostatic glands at an inked surgical margin in which no carcinoma is present.
Sujets

Adenocarcinoma/pathol...

Adenocarcinoma/surger...

Humans

Male

Neoplasm Staging

Prostatectomy/methods...

Prostatic Neoplasms/p...

Prostatic Neoplasms/s...

Societies, Medical

Specimen Handling/met...

Urinary Bladder/patho...

Urinary Bladder/surge...

PID Serval
serval:BIB_162A0CA3704A
DOI
10.1038/modpathol.2010.155
PMID
20729812
WOS
000285868900006
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/89423
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2012-03-14T09:50:07.180Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T17:44:37Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales