Titre
Methodische Anleitung für Scoping Reviews (JBI-Methodologie) []
Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Auteur(s)
von Elm, E.
Auteure/Auteur
Schreiber, G.
Auteure/Auteur
Haupt, C.C.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les unités
ISSN
2212-0289
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2019-06
Volume
143
Première page
1
Dernière page/numéro d’article
7
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
allemand
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Reviews of primary research studies are becoming increasingly important as the concept of evidence-based practice in healthcare is gaining more and more influence and the number of research projects is increasing enormously. One of the less well-known types of review is the "scoping review." Scoping reviews are conducted when one first needs to take stock of the research literature. For example, scoping reviews are conducted in order to establish provisional working definitions or to define topics or subject areas conceptually. Preparing a scoping review also makes sense if the literature has not yet been comprehensively assessed or if it contains a complex or heterogeneous problem so that a more precise systematic review of the evidence is not appropriate. Scoping reviews can also serve to determine the scope and significance of a prospective classical systematic review. Finally, scoping reviews are also a good way to bundle and communicate research results, identify research gaps, and formulate recommendations for future research. This article explains the methodology of scoping reviews, their differences as compared to systematic reviews, and the reasons why they could be conducted. This guide to conducting scoping reviews is based on the methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI).
PID Serval
serval:BIB_2A829BD84E99
PMID
Date de création
2019-07-22T16:22:11.826Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T19:14:21Z