• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. "Add Insult to Injury" : Double Bind and its Underlying Argumentative Anatomy
 
  • Détails
Titre

"Add Insult to Injury" : Double Bind and its Underlying Argumentative Anatomy

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Rivista di psicolinguistica applicata  
Auteur(s)
Luciani, Margherita
Auteure/Auteur
Convertini, Josephine
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les unités
Troubles spectre autistique Adulte  
ISSN
1592-1328
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2024-08-28
Volume
24
Numéro
1
Première page
63
Dernière page/numéro d’article
77
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Patient and psychotherapist communication is fundamental to pursuing every therapeutic path with efficacy. In the present paper, we offer an argumentative reading of Bateson's (Bateson 1976/1984) concept of double bind, contextualizing it within the therapeutic intervention. The work aims to investigate the underlying inferential processes at the very core of the double-bind phenomenon. Double bind is first defined following the traditional conception, which designates a communicative situation in which an agent or a group receives (at least) two contradictory messages that force him into an unresolvable dilemma. Then, an argumentative analysis using analytical tools borrowed from modern and contemporary argumentation theories is provided concerning a famous example of a mother-son double bind given by Bateson. We claim that if we think of arguments as `invitations to inference', we can say that the agent causing the double bind uses the two contradictory messages as two different arguments from which the recipient could draw an inference about two implicit standpoints. In this article, we have shed light on the pragmatic features that make a double bind particularly hurtful for the recipient. The argumentative analysis has enabled an in-depth understanding of the communicative processes at the very core of the double bind phenomena, which can in turn be deployed in clinical settings. The article ends with a discussion about the implications and directions for future studies.
Sujets

Double bind

Bateson

Argumentative structu...

Inference

Communication

PID Serval
serval:BIB_A5D4578841FE
DOI
10.19272/202407701004
WOS
001296144800004
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/145997
Date de création
2024-09-10T13:54:35.905Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T22:07:57Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales