Titre
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.
Type
synthèse (review)
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Auteur(s)
Colomer-Lahiguera, S.
Auteure/Auteur
Steimer, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Ellis, U.
Auteure/Auteur
Eicher, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Tompson, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Corbière, T.
Auteure/Auteur
Haase, K.R.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Liens vers les unités
ISSN
2045-7634
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2023-07
Volume
12
Numéro
14
Première page
15530
Dernière page/numéro d’article
15543
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research emphasizes the importance of doing research with, rather than for people with lived health/illness experience(s). The purpose of this scoping review is to investigate the breadth and depth of scientific literature on PPI in cancer research and to identify how is PPI applied and reported in cancer research.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo up to March 2022. All titles/abstracts and full-text results were screened by two reviewers. Data were analyzed and are presented in both narrative and tabular format.
We screened 22,009 titles/abstract, reviewed 375 full-text articles, of which 101 studies were included in this review. 66 papers applied PPI; 35 used co-design methodologies. PPI in cancer research in published research has increased steadily since 2015 and often includes those with a past diagnosis of cancer or relatives/informal caregivers. The most common applied methods were workshops or interviews. PPI was generally used at the level of consultation/advisor and occurred mainly in early stages of research. Costs related to PPI were mentioned in 25 papers and four papers described training provided for PPI.
Results of our review demonstrate the nature and extent of PPI expansion in cancer research. Researchers and research organizations entering the fray of PPI should consider planning and reporting elements such as the stage, level, and role type of PPI, as well as methods and strategies put in place to assure diversity. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of whether all these elements meet the stated PPI purpose will help to grasp its impact on research outcomes.
Two patients participated in the stakeholder consultation as part of the scoping review methodology, contributed to the discussion on refining the results, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Both are co-authors of this manuscript.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo up to March 2022. All titles/abstracts and full-text results were screened by two reviewers. Data were analyzed and are presented in both narrative and tabular format.
We screened 22,009 titles/abstract, reviewed 375 full-text articles, of which 101 studies were included in this review. 66 papers applied PPI; 35 used co-design methodologies. PPI in cancer research in published research has increased steadily since 2015 and often includes those with a past diagnosis of cancer or relatives/informal caregivers. The most common applied methods were workshops or interviews. PPI was generally used at the level of consultation/advisor and occurred mainly in early stages of research. Costs related to PPI were mentioned in 25 papers and four papers described training provided for PPI.
Results of our review demonstrate the nature and extent of PPI expansion in cancer research. Researchers and research organizations entering the fray of PPI should consider planning and reporting elements such as the stage, level, and role type of PPI, as well as methods and strategies put in place to assure diversity. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of whether all these elements meet the stated PPI purpose will help to grasp its impact on research outcomes.
Two patients participated in the stakeholder consultation as part of the scoping review methodology, contributed to the discussion on refining the results, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Both are co-authors of this manuscript.
PID Serval
serval:BIB_C831BC239A67
PMID
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2023-06-22T15:38:45.092Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T23:17:21Z
Fichier(s)![Vignette d'image]()
En cours de chargement...
Nom
Cancer Medicine - 2023 - Colomer‐Lahiguera - Patient and public involvement in cancer research A scoping review.pdf
Version du manuscrit
published
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Taille
2.86 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
PID Serval
serval:BIB_C831BC239A67.P001
URN
urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C831BC239A675
Somme de contrôle
(MD5):9109ff7d70ca22f9979cd34c2ed6f8e7