• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Outcome of comatose patients following cardiac arrest: When mRS completes CPC.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Outcome of comatose patients following cardiac arrest: When mRS completes CPC.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
Resuscitation  
Auteur(s)
Tanaka Gutiez, M.
Auteure/Auteur
Beuchat, I.
Auteure/Auteur
Novy, J.
Auteure/Auteur
Ben-Hamouda, N.
Auteure/Auteur
Rossetti, A.O.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Rossetti, Andrea  
Novy, Jan  
Ben Hamouda, Nawfel  
Beuchat, Isabelle  
Liens vers les unités
Neurologie  
Recherche en neurosciences  
Médecine intensive adulte (SMIA)  
ISSN
1873-1570
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2023-11
Volume
192
Première page
109997
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Good outcome in patients following cardiac arrest (CA) is usually defined as Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2, while CPC 3 is debated, and CPC 4-5 represent poor outcome. We aimed to assess when the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) can improve CPC outcome description, especially in CPC 3. We further aimed to correlate neuron specific enolase (NSE) with both functional measures to explore their relationship with neuronal damage.
Peak NSE within the first 48 hours, and CPC and mRS at 3 months were prospectively collected for 665 consecutive comatose adults following CA treated between April 2016 and April 2023. For each CPC category, mRS was described. We considered good outcome as mRS 1-3, in line with existing recommendations. CPC and mRS were correlated to peak serum NSE using non-parametric assessments.
CPC 1, 2, 4 and 5 correlated almost perfectly with mRS in terms of good and poor outcomes. However, CPC 3 was heterogeneously associated to the dichotomized mRS (53.1% had good outcome (mRS 0-3), 46.9% poor outcome (mRS 4-6)). NSE was strongly correlated with CPC (Spearman's rho 0.616, P < 0.001) and mRS (Spearman's rho 0.613, P < 0.001).
CPC and mRS correlate similarly with neuronal damage. Whilst CPC 1-2 and CPC 4-5 are strongly associated with mRS 0-3 and, respectively, with mRS 5-6, CPC 3 is heterogenous: both good and poor mRS scores are found within this category. Therefore, we suggest that the mRS should be routinely assessed in patients with CPC 3 to refine outcome description.
Sujets

Cardiology and Cardio...

Emergency Nursing

Emergency Medicine

CPC

Cardiac Arrest

Neurological Outcome

Neuron Specific Enola...

mRS

PID Serval
serval:BIB_9AA68BCAC7BD
DOI
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109997
PMID
37827427
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/166221
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2023-10-11T07:53:45.413Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T23:45:49Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales