• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Reproducibility of twitch mouth pressure, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, and maximal inspiratory pressure.
 
  • Détails
Titre

Reproducibility of twitch mouth pressure, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, and maximal inspiratory pressure.

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
European Respiratory Journal  
Auteur(s)
Maillard, J.O.
Auteure/Auteur
Burdet, L.
Auteure/Auteur
van Melle, G.
Auteure/Auteur
Fitting, J.W.
Auteure/Auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Fitting, Jean-William  
Liens vers les unités
Pneumologie  
Médecine sociale et préventive (IUMSP)  
ISSN
0903-1936
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
1998
Volume
11
Numéro
4
Première page
901
Dernière page/numéro d’article
905
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Twitch mouth pressure (Pmo,tw) during magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) were recently proposed as alternative noninvasive methods for assessing inspiratory muscle strength. This study aimed to compare their reproducibility with maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in normal subjects. Ten healthy subjects were studied at functional residual capacity in semirecumbent position. Cervical magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation was performed during gentle expiration against an occlusion incorporating a small leak. Constancy of stimulation was controlled by recording diaphragmatic electromyogram. Within and between-session reproducibility of pressure were studied for Pmo,tw, SNIP, and MIP. The subjects were studied during a session of 10 manoeuvres repeated after 1 day and 1 month. The mean values were 16 cmH2O for Pmo,tw, 118 cmH2O for SNIP, and 115 cmH2O for MIP. For the three tests, the within subject variation was small in relation to between-subject variation, with the intraclass correlation coefficient ranging 0.79-0.90 for Pmo,tw, 0.85-0.92 for SNIP, and 0.88-0.92 for MIP. At 1 day interval, the coefficient of repeatability (2 SD of differences) was 3.6 cmH2O for Pmo,tw, 32 cmH2O for SNIP and 28 cmH2O for MIP. At 1 month interval, the coefficient of repeatability was 5.8 cmH2O for Pmo,tw, 23 cmH2O for SNIP and 21 cmH2O for MIP. We conclude that the within session reproducibility of the new tests twitch mouth pressure and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure is sufficient to be clinically useful. For sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, the between session reproducibility established after 1 day was maintained after 1 month. For twitch mouth pressure, the between session reproducibility declined slightly after 1 month. These characteristics should be considered when using these methods to follow an individual patient over time.
Sujets

Adult

Female

Humans

Inspiratory Capacity

Male

Mouth

Nose

Physical Stimulation

Pressure

Reproducibility of Re...

Respiratory Muscles

PID Serval
serval:BIB_A912416E50A9
DOI
10.1183/09031936.98.11040901
PMID
9623695
WOS
000073828000019
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/178057
Open Access
Oui
Date de création
2008-01-25T08:43:26.556Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-21T00:43:53Z
  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales