• Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS
  • Par Publication Par Personne Par Unité
    • English
    • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site

IRIS | Système d’Information de la Recherche Institutionnelle

  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
UNIL
  • English
  • Français
Se connecter
IRIS
  • Accueil
  • Personnes
  • Publications
  • Unités
  • Périodiques
  • Mon espace de travail
  • Aide IRIS

Parcourir IRIS

  • Par Publication
  • Par Personne
  • Par Unité
  1. Accueil
  2. IRIS
  3. Publication
  4. General practitioners can evaluate the material, social and health dimensions of patient social status
 
  • Détails
Titre

General practitioners can evaluate the material, social and health dimensions of patient social status

Type
article
Institution
UNIL/CHUV/Unisanté + institutions partenaires
Périodique
PLOS One
Auteur(s)
Chatelard, S.
Co-première auteure/Co-premier auteur
Bodenmann, P.
Auteure/Auteur
Vaucher, P.
Auteure/Auteur
Herzig, L.
Auteure/Auteur
Bischoff, T.
Auteure/Auteur
Burnand, B.
Co-dernière auteure/Co-dernier auteur
Liens vers les personnes
Bischoff, Thomas  
Bodenmann, Patrick  
Herzig, Lilli  
Burnand, Bernard  
Liens vers les unités
PMU/UNISANTE  
Médecine sociale et préventive (IUMSP)  
ISSN
8755-8920
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Volume
9
Numéro
1
Première page
1
Dernière page/numéro d’article
8
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To identify which physician and patient characteristics are associated with physicians' estimation of their patient social status.DESIGN: Cross-sectional ulticentric survey. SETTING: Fourty-seven primary care private offices in Western Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 2030 patients ≥ 16, who encountered a general practitioner (GP) between September 2010 and February 2011. MAIN MEASURES: PRIMARY OUTCOME: patient social status perceived by GPs, using the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status, ranging from the bottom (0) to the top (10) of the social scale.Secondary outcome: Difference between GP's evaluation and patient's own evaluation of their social status. Potential patient correlates: material and social deprivation using the DiPCare-Q, health status using the EQ-5D, sources of income, and level of education. GP characteristics: opinion regarding patients' deprivation and its influence on health and care. RESULTS: To evaluate patient social status, GPs considered the material, social, and health aspects of deprivation, along with education level, and amount and type of income. GPs declaring a frequent reflexive consideration of their own prejudice towards deprived patients, gave a higher estimation of patients' social status (+1.0, p = 0.002). Choosing a less costly treatment for deprived patients was associated with a lower estimation (-0.7, p = 0.002). GP's evaluation of patient social status was 0.5 point higher than the patient's own estimate (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: GPs can perceive the various dimensions of patient social status, although heterogeneously, according partly to their own characteristics. Compared to patients' own evaluation, GPs overestimate patient social status.
Sujets

Antibodies/classifica...

Female

Humans

Immunoglobulins/class...

Immunologic Technique...

Infertility/immunolog...

Male

Spermatozoa/immunolog...

PID Serval
serval:BIB_5D78EF2BFF14
PMID
24454752
WOS
000330235100034
Permalien
https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/94442
Date de création
2014-04-14T06:21:13.712Z
Date de création dans IRIS
2025-05-20T18:07:54Z
Fichier(s)
En cours de chargement...
Vignette d'image
Nom

BIB_5D78EF2BFF14.P001.pdf

Version du manuscrit

published

Taille

211.11 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

PID Serval

serval:BIB_5D78EF2BFF14.P001

URN

urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_5D78EF2BFF141

Somme de contrôle

(MD5):6078190afe34c0922502a2afdb510ba1

  • Copyright © 2024 UNIL
  • Informations légales